September 11, 2019 Brazil’s Minister of Finance announces intention to levy tax on payments and financial transactions at a rate that may be between 0.2% and 1% Although a project or bill has not been officially proposed, Paulo Guedes, Minister of Finance of Brazil, has confirmed such intention in public speeches. As part of the tax reform discussions in Brazil, the Minister of Finance, Paulo Guedes, confirmed that President Jair Bolsonaro's Administration intends to create a new tax that would be levied on payments and financial transactions. The tax could be similar to the previous provisional contribution on financial transactions (CPMF — Contribuição Provisória sobre Movimentação Financeira), but potentially with a broader scope. According to Mr. Guedes, the tax on financial transactions (Imposto sobre Transacoes Financeiras — ITF) would be imposed on any payments and financial transactions, regardless of whether they have an economic purpose, and it could generate revenue of up to BRL 150 billion (approx. USD 36 billion) a year. Members of the Ministry of Finance indicated that tax collection would be focused on banks and other financial system agents. The Administration will propose an ITF rate, which will depend on the taxes it is intended to (partially) replace, as follows:
Regardless of the Administration's proposed rate and taxes to be replaced, Congress will ultimately determine the ITF rate, as well as what taxes may be replaced by it. The fact that the ITF resembles the CPMF, a tax that was levied on certain financial transactions for 10 years and eliminated in 2007, has elicited many negative reactions. Many economists note that the ITF — which applies even to simple bank deposits — is cumulative, taxing Brazilian reals at every stage, thereby imposing a heavier burden on the less wealthy. It may also drive transactions to a cash basis to avoid the tax, as opposed to completing transactions through the financial system. Thus, the ITF could affect compliance in several areas. The effects for businesses must still be assessed. ———————————————
| |||||||||||||||||||||||