US Tax Newsroom

 Tax News Update    Email this document    Print this document

September 13, 2019

California legislation reduces the population of workers that can be classified as independent contractors

On September 11, 2019, the California Senate passed legislation under AB-5 to codify the California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex and expand and clarify its application. This bill would significantly impact all industries that customarily engage independent contractors; however, it is widely believed that it would have the greatest impact on the gig economy (e.g., rideshare and delivery drivers). Governor Newsom has signaled his support for the bill and is expected to sign it into law in the coming days.


Prior to April 30, 2018, and for most matters before the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, depending on the remedial nature of the legislation at issue, the "multi-factor" or the "economic realities" test was applied under the California Supreme Court case of S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341 (Borello). In applying this economic reality test, the most significant factor considered was whether the person to whom service is rendered (the employer or principal) has control or the right to control the worker, both as to the work done and the manner and means in which it is performed. There were an additional 11 factors also considered.

On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles, a landmark decision in which the Court created a presumption that a worker who performs services is an employee, not an independent contractor, and adopted a new worker classification standard. The result of the Dynamex case was to replace the Borello standard with the new "ABC test." The Dynamex holding was narrow in its application as it was limited to wage orders that were issued by the Industrial Welfare Commission.

For unemployment and disability insurance purposes, whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor is currently determined by applying factors contained in common law or employment and statutory provisions of the California unemployment insurance code. The California Employment Development Department provides a questionnaire in DE-38 for this purpose.

Key provisions under California AB-5

  • Codifies the Dynamex (ABC test) standard. California AB-5 codifies the Dynamex (ABC test) standard for purposes of the unemployment insurance code and for the wage orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission. Accordingly, a person providing labor or services for remuneration shall be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all the following conditions are satisfied:
    1. The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact.
    2. The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business.
    3. The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.
  • Retains current exceptions for the definition of employee. Any exception to the term "employee," "employer," "employ," or "independent contractor," and any extensions of employer status or liability, shall remain in full effect. (California AB-5 2750.3(a)(2).)
  • Reverts to Borello standard (i.e., old standard) in some cases. If a court of law rules that the new standard (i.e., ABC test) cannot be applied to a particular case, the determination of employee or independent contractor status shall instead be governed by the old standard (i.e., Borello). (California AB-5 2750.3(a)(3).)
  • Exempts certain occupations from Dynamex (ABC test). Certain occupations would be exempt from the application of the ABC test and would instead be subject to the older standard (i.e., Borello). These exempt occupations would include: licensed insurance agents, certain licensed health care professionals, registered securities broker-dealers or investment advisers, direct sales salespersons, real estate licensees, commercial fishermen, workers providing licensed barber or cosmetology services, and others performing work under a contract for professional services, with another business entity, or pursuant to a subcontract in the construction industry. (California AB-5 2750.3(b).)

Effective date under AB-5

California AB-5 provides that the codification of the ABC Test is not a change in law, but rather declaratory of existing law and should apply retroactively to existing claims to the extent permitted by law.

Generally, and except where otherwise noted within the law, the other provisions of AB-5 are effective with work performed on or after January 1, 2020.

Any worker who is an employee by application of this law is not required to be covered by worker's compensation insurance until July 1, 2020. (AB-5 Assembly floor analysis, 9-10-2019.)

Ernst & Young insights

Tightening the worker classification rules so that more workers are eligible for benefits, like unemployment insurance, and protections, like minimum wage and overtime, is something other states are also considering (e.g., Alaska, New York and Oregon). There are also federal proposals similar to California AB-5 being promoted by federal lawmakers with an emphasis of giving gig workers the right to union representation.

California AB-5 and similar legislation are likely to face fierce challenges from businesses reliant on gig workers, making the outcome uncertain.

Finally, implementation of the law will be complex, requiring detailed guidance from the California agencies concerned with worker classification.

In the meantime, businesses will need to consider the employment tax and human resources policy changes that will be necessary to comply with California AB-5 once enacted.


Contact Information
For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:
Workforce Advisory Services - Employment Tax Advisory Services
   • Stephanie Pfister (
   • Michael Orton (
   • Kristie Lowery (
   • Debera Salam (
   • Kenneth Hausser (
EY State and Local Tax Contact
   • Craig Winchester (


EY Payroll News Flash




The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Ernst & Young LLP to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader's specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of non-tax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her Ernst & Young LLP or other tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. Ernst & Young LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.


Copyright © 1996 – 2020, Ernst & Young LLP


All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Ernst & Young LLP.


View Tax News Update master agreement and EY privacy statement