Tax News Update    Email this document    Print this document  

May 26, 2022
2022-0844

U.S. International Tax This Week for May 26

Ernst & Young's U.S. International Tax This Week newsletter for the week ending May 26 is now available. Prepared by Ernst & Young's International Tax Services group, this weekly update summarizes important news, cases, and other developments in international taxation.

—————————————————————————
Spotlight

Congressional Democrats are adjusting to a new "soft deadline" to reach agreement on a limited Build Back Better package as the first self-imposed target date of Memorial Day is poised to come and go without consensus. The press is quoting some Democrats as saying that an agreement before the August recess gives legislators all of August to put together a bill. One Democratic Senator was also quoted as saying recent discussions among Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Joe Manchin have been useful, although no details are being made public.

Further details have emerged as to Treasury's thinking in regard to additional US foreign tax credit guidance that would supplement final regulations issued in December 2021. A senior Treasury official said the US is considering addressing royalty withholding tax and cost recovery and perhaps, at some point, more guidance on disregarded distributions in the foreign tax credit context. On royalty withholding tax, Treasury is not going to move away from the general rule that provides a legal test that compares foreign law to US domestic law, nor the existing royalty sourcing rule that looks to the place of use. To the extent the foreign jurisdiction has a different rule, then the reasonably similar standard will continue not to be met, the official said.

The Treasury official indicated, however, that sympathetic cases are being made and Treasury is considering a safe harbor for certain business models. He used the example in which a license is in place and the license only includes the right to use IP in a particular jurisdiction (which then occurs). Treasury could deem the attribution rule to be met in that fact pattern and the credit would be allowed. The official added that it is probably not possible for the safe harbor to provide benefits in all types of business models, but it would provide some relief. According to the official, this would be a new rule and probably would come out as a notice or proposed regulation that provides an opportunity for comment. In regard to a timeline, the official said the US is still collecting feedback and the change — which would be narrowly drawn — is months away, but expected to be released in 2022.

The official also was quoted as saying the Internal Revenue Service is considering a clarification to the foreign tax credit regulations' cost recovery rule. The clarification would explain that the cost recovery rule does not require foreign law to be identical to US law, but rather viewed as a principle, whereby: "If the principle underlying the foreign limitation is consistent with the general limitations in the code — they are based on anti-base-erosion, profit-shifting, public policy concerns, [or] base-broadening concerns — they ought to be comparable." This clarification can be expected before the proposed royalty withholding regulation.

More guidance is also being considered in respect to disregarded distributions, although not as soon as other forthcoming foreign tax credit guidance.

An Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) official this week was quoted as saying that finalization of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 Pillar One multilateral convention will be delayed, with "practical implementation" of the convention probably taking place "from 2024 onwards." He said that the Task Force on the Digital Economy, which is developing the Pillar One Amount A model rules and multilateral convention, is now expected to finalize the rules and convention by the end of 2022, instead of mid-2022 as planned.

The OECD official also said the organization hopes to have a "principal agreement on all of the remaining technical aspects" of the BEPS 2.0 Pillar One elements when the G-20 Finance Ministers meet in Bali in July.

In regard to Pillar Two, the technical work is complete, another OECD official said, and it now falls to the various jurisdictions to implement the new rules. The official added the OECD has a list of Pillar Two guidance requests that it is prioritizing. The OECD plans to publish that guidance as soon as it is approved, but no later than the end of 2022. The OECD is also reportedly working on a standard return for Pillar Two's global anti-base erosion (GloBE) rules.

The OECD on 20 May issued a report for the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors that provides recommendations to strengthen tax administrations' cooperation in the context of increasingly coordinated international rules, including the BEPS 2.0 project. The report considers the "need for a simple, collaborative, and digital administration of common rules," including how tax information exchange could evolve as well as improve "timeliness through real-time data availability and incorporating compliance by design."

—————————————————————————
Upcoming Webcasts

Tax in the time of COVID-19: Update on legislative, economic, regulatory and IRS developments (June 3)
During this EY Webcast, Ernst & Young professionals will discuss how businesses can navigate the tax policy environment and continue to effectively operate their tax function in this time of crisis and change. Panelists will provide updates on: (i) the US economy and tax policy; (ii) breaking developments; and (iii) what’s happening at the IRS.

The indirect tax technology journey: Now. Next. Beyond. (June 9)
During this EY Webcast, Ernst & Young professionals will share insights into how market-leading organizations are using technology to adapt to new legislation and market trends, and to effectively transform tax operations. This webcast will focus on leading practices for global indirect tax technology selection and implementation.

Competent Authority procedures in cross-border controversy in the Americas (June 15)
During this EY Webcast, Ernst & Young professionals will discuss trends and developments in Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) and Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) in selected jurisdictions in the Americas.

—————————————————————————
Recent Tax Alerts

United States

— May 26: USCIS to implement premium processing for certain pending EB-1 and EB-2 Form I-140 petitions (Tax Alert 2022-0841)

Africa

— May 25: Uganda issues Tax Amendment Bills for 2022 (Tax Alert 2022-0834)

Asia

— May 25: Hong Kong Tax Authority clarifies multiple issues around profits tax (Tax Alert 2022-0837)

— May 24: Japan implements sanction measures against Russia (Tax Alert 2022-0824)

— May 20: Hong Kong Court rules booked trading profits are not necessarily subject to profits tax (Tax Alert 2022-0817)

Canada & Latin America

— May 25: Uruguay extends reduced VAT rate for tourism sector (Tax Alert 2022-0840)

Europe

— May 25: Luxembourg Tax Authority revises MDR guidance (Tax Alert 2022-0836)

— May 25: Swiss Parliament to debate tonnage tax bill (Tax Alert 2022-0833)

— May 25: Spanish National High Court issues new favorable decision on reclaims by non-Spanish sovereign funds (Tax Alert 2022-0830)

— May 24: UK delays reporting rules for digital platforms (Tax Alert 2022-0827)

Oceania

— May 23: Australian Labor Party wins 2022 Federal Election | Overview of key policies (Tax Alert 2022-0822)

————————————————————————
Additional Resources

Ernst & Young Client Portal, the leading source for news, analysis, and reference materials for corporate tax professionals, has a variety of content of interest to international tax practitioners, including:

EY/Passport. EY/Passport is your guide to planning ventures in the global economy, offering a wealth of tax and business knowledge on more than 150 countries.

Because the matters covered herein are complicated, U.S. International Tax This Week should not be regarded as offering a complete explanation and should not be used for making decisions. Any decision concerning matters covered herein should be reviewed with a qualified tax advisor.