14 January 2024 This Week in Tax Policy for January 12 Congress: The $1.66 trillion FY2024 topline spending agreement announced by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) on January 7 has caused an uproar from some House conservatives, who effectively shut down any floor business that requires a rule for voting. (Voting down rules was also employed by some members to express dissatisfaction with legislation in the fall of 2023, contravening the historical role of the rule vote as mostly a formality.) Speaker Johnson is vowing to stand behind the agreement. There is increasing talk that an additional short-term continuing resolution (CR) will be necessary to patch funding beyond the January 19 deadline. Second-ranking Senate Republican John Thune (R-SD) said January 9 that a CR until March may be necessary. Anticipating that an additional short-term continuing resolution (CR) will be necessary to patch funding beyond the January 19 deadline, Leader Schumer filed a procedural motion on H.R. 2872, the legislative vehicle for a Continuing Resolution, with a procedural vote next Tuesday. The Senate is in pro forma session only today and will next convene for business on Tuesday, January 16. The House will also reconvene on Tuesday, at noon for morning hour and 2 p.m. for legislative business. On Wednesday, January 17 at 10 a.m., the Senate Budget Committee will hold a hearing, "The Great Tax Escape: Closing Corporate Loopholes that Reward Offshoring Jobs and Profits." Witnesses:
Friday, January 19 (12:00 p.m. ET) is the EY Webcast, "Tax in a time of transition: legislative, economic, regulatory and IRS developments." Tax bill prospects: The release of details of a business and family tax package more than a year in the making seemed imminent as congressional tax writers held separate meetings to discuss the proposal January 10, but no formal statement emerged from committee chairmen. House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) said January 10 he is "not going to put a timeline on anything" and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-OR) said in Law360, "There is no deal … We've got more work to do." Wyden has said lawmakers are aiming to complete consideration by the start of the tax filing season, which is January 29, focusing on one piece of the package, which would expand refundable child tax credits for the current filing season. There was no exact diagnosis of the holdup, and in what form details would be shared has been unclear, but some members expressed dissatisfaction with the emerging plan; there are ongoing efforts to add items to it; and broader political dynamics in both chambers raise questions about how a tax bill would be received and supported. The discussed package is reported to total roughly $70 billion and is expected to propose restoring IRC Section 174 R&D expensing and prior parameters for IRC Section 163(j) interest deductibility — possibly retroactive to 2022 and extended through 2025 — plus address the expensing phasedown, the Child Tax Credit (CTC), and include other provisions. Politico confirmed speculation in recent days that, on R&D, "The cost of the research and development item will be less than originally predicted because it includes full deductions for domestic R&D only, and not foreign R&D." A crackdown on the Employee Retention Credit has been widely identified as a potential revenue offset. Support from other Democrats has been mixed. Chairman Wyden said Democrats had prevailed in achieving rough parity in the package on spending on the CTC relative to business tax provisions. Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH), who has long called for restoring R&D expensing, celebrated the prospect of something finally being done on the issue alongside a "tailored expansion of the child tax credit." And Sherrod Brown (D-OH), a principal advocate for a CTC expansion who is up for re-election this year in a state that voted Republican in the 2020 presidential election and 2022 Senate election, said he was happy with that aspect of the deal, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. However, other senators and Democratic House members suggested the package falls short. Ways & Means Ranking Member Richard Neal (D-MA) said making the tax credit fully refundable continues to be important to Democrats and some of the proposals in the agreement are "going backward," Bloomberg Government reported. Punchbowl News reported that Democrats pointedly questioned Neal over the issue during a Wednesday meeting. Politico subsequently reported Neal as saying Ways and Means Democrats may be against the bill in its current form, citing the desire for a larger CTC and greater refundability. "We're still trying to build a bigger child tax credit because we think it's a reasonable balance with what we could do on the business side," Neal said in Tax Notes, adding that there's still enough time to make something happen despite the pressing government funding deadlines. Support from both Neal and Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-ID) had been uncertain in the run-up to the bill. Crapo has acknowledged the political difficulties such a bill faces in both the Senate and House. As for as additions, Finance Committee Democrats are reportedly pushing for housing provisions in any package, and Chairman Wyden laid down a marker for inclusion of that issue in a December 12 floor speech. Ways & Means member Greg Steube (R-FL) expects his disaster relief proposal to be added to the package, which he also said could see a House vote next week, according to Morning Tax. At the 2024 D.C. Bar Tax Conference January 10, a House Democratic aide suggested that the strong bipartisan support for the United States-Taiwan Expedited Double-Tax Relief Act (H.R. 5988) could make it a strong candidate for inclusion in an eventual package. Looking ahead to 2025: The Law360 article reported, "Wyden said the negotiations are a precursor to next year's tax negotiations as provisions of the 2017 TCJA expire. 'If you improve the child tax credit, you really strengthen your hand for the big tax negotiations that are going to go on [in] 2025 because you'll be starting from a higher' ground, Wyden said." On a related note, the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released a list of provisions of the tax code that expire in 2024—2034, available here. A Congressional Research Service (CRS) reference table describes TCJA provisions and how they are scheduled to change after 2025, available here. Nominations: The nomination of Marjorie Rollinson to be Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service was resubmitted to the Senate along with many others January 8, consistent with indications that a Finance re-vote is necessary because of the change to the 2nd session of the 118th Congress. "Nominations that have been neither confirmed nor rejected by the Senate at the time the Senate adjourns sine die or for a period of more than 30 days are returned to the President … " the Congressional Research Service explained. "If a nomination is returned to the President, it is no longer eligible for consideration by the Senate. The President may submit a new nomination, either for the previously returned nominee or for a new candidate. This new nomination is referred to its committee of jurisdiction, which must report out or be discharged before the Senate can vote on confirmation … " Loss deduction bill: Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Jim McGovern (D-MA) January 10 introduced a bill (H.R. 6938) to reinstate the pre-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act deduction for personal casualty losses. The TCJA generally eliminated personal casualty and theft losses not associated with a federal disaster area, though the change expires with many other TCJA individual provisions after 2025. The Washington Post said the impetus for the bill is tax bills faced by victims of scams and other thefts and it "would allow people who have suffered losses since the 2017 tax law change to amend their returns and claim the deduction." Pillar One: Also at the D.C. Bar conference, Christopher Bello, Attorney-Advisor, Office of Tax Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury mentioned three remaining sticking points that need to be addressed for the US to be comfortable with signing the Pillar One multilateral convention (MLC): treating Puerto Rico as part of the US, other countries accepting withholding provisions and some tax certainty provisions, and a robust Amount B. IRA guidance tracker: This table describes select IRS guidance related to the Inflation Reduction Act.
Document ID: 2024-0204 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||