07 January 2025

Italian penalty protection regime for tax hybrids becomes effective

  • A penalty protection regime for tax-hybrid mismatches is now available after the publication of the relevant ministerial decree in the Italian Official Gazette.
  • The regime requires taxpayers to prepare qualifying documentation disclosing each covered transaction for each fiscal year. Alternatively, for imported hybrid mismatches, the penalty protection may be achieved by adopting a single internal control framework.
  • The regime is also available for past fiscal years, provided that certain deadlines are respected.
  • Limitations may apply with reference to transactions for which the Italian tax authorities have already started audit activities.
 

Executive summary

On 20 December 2024, an Italian government decree implementing the penalty protection regime (introduced by Legislative Decree n.209 of 27 December 2023)1 pertaining to tax-hybrid mismatches (Implementing Decree) was published in the Official Gazette.

The new regime allows taxpayers to prepare qualifying documentation (Documentation) that can protect them from administrative penalties. If a dispute arises involving hybrid-mismatch rules and leads to a higher tax being assessed, the penalty for an unfaithful tax return (ordinarily ranging from 90% to 180% for violations committed by the end of August 2024 and equal to 70% for violations committed starting from 1 September 2024) should not apply if, in the course of the field agents' activity, the taxpayer delivers Documentation that complies with the instructions contained in the Implementing Decree.

To serve as penalty protection, the Documentation must be prepared yearly in compliance with instructions set forth by the Implementing Decree (explained below). The penalty protection will apply only with respect to transactions duly described in the annual Documentation for which the taxpayer has truthfully and thoroughly disclosed any relevant element, in part by showing the survey criteria (see "Article 3 (Survey criteria)," below) that was followed to ascertain the existence or exclusion of a hybrid transaction. As a partial exception to this detailed annual documentation procedure, the Implementing Decree provides that, with reference to any risk of "imported" hybrid mismatches (as opposed to those related to "direct" hybrid mismatches for which the ordinary documentation requirements remain mandatory), penalty protection may be achieved by the adoption of a substitute procedure represented by a general internal control framework aimed at detecting the existence of imported hybrids.2

The documentation must be prepared in Italian and electronically signed with a timestamp showing a date not subsequent to that of the filing of the corporate income tax (CIT) return for the fiscal year (FY) covered by the Documentation. The deadline for a calendar-year taxpayer who wants to benefit from the Documentation for FY 2023 and FY 2024, should be the same as the deadline for filing the 2024 CIT return (i.e., end of October 2025). For FYs prior to the FY ongoing on 29 December 2023, the Documentation will need to be properly prepared by the sixth month after the date of approval of the Implementing Decree.

The penalty protection regime is not available for transactions that tax authorities audited prior to 29 December 2023.

Detailed discussion

The Implementing Decree consists of 13 articles and is accompanied by three Annexes. Annex A lists the information that the Documentation must include about the taxpayer and its group, as well as with respect to the reported transactions. Annex B shows the procedure that the taxpayer must follow to identify any relevant hybrid mismatch (including reference to the special procedure related to imported hybrid mismatches). Annex C provides guidelines for the taxpayers to investigate the existence of any structured arrangement.3

Article 1 (Definitions) — Among various definitions (mostly following those of the Italian anti-hybrid provisions, i.e., Legislative Decree n.142 of 29 November 2018),4 the Implementing Decree defines a "Relevant Transaction" as a transaction that triggers or may reasonably trigger one of the tax-hybrid mismatch outcomes regulated by the Italian anti-hybrid provisions (Covered Tax-Hybrid Mismatch). The Decree defines "Homogeneous Group" as a set of Relevant Transactions occurring in place in the same FY, involving the same or different counterparties and triggering, for the taxpayer, the same or substantially equivalent legal and economic effects as well as the same treatment under the Italian anti-hybrid provisions. The Implementing Decree also defines "Transitional Period" as the period between 29 December 2023 (i.e., the effective date of the Legislative Decree introducing the penalty protection regime for hybrid transactions) and the later of the deadline for filing the tax return related to the FY ongoing as of such date (i.e., for calendar-year companies, the end of October 2024) or the sixth month after the "approval" of the Implementing Decree (further explained in "Article 11 (Documentation for FYs prior to the one ongoing on 29 December 2023)," below).<

Article 2 (Subjective scope) — The Documentation may be filed by any Italian tax resident or by any permanent establishment of a foreign resident. Each Italian company of a group must file its own documentation unless the group appoints one Italian company as the filer for all the members (Empowered Taxpayer). In this case, the Documentation must include separate sections for each taxpayer.

Article 3 (Survey criteria) — To identify a Relevant Transaction or a Homogeneous Group, the taxpayer must explain the process applied to ascertain the existence of tax-hybrid mismatches. In this respect, Annex A provides a list of information that the taxpayer must include to make the Documentation suitable for the penalty protection regime, such as:

  • Information on the group: Description of the multinational group; corporate diagram showing the place of incorporation and tax residence of each company, the tax-transparent or tax-opaque nature of the taxpayer based on the perspective of the country of incorporation, the country of the company's residence and that of the investors' residence; information about any permanent establishment and any tax grouping
  • Information on the taxpayer: General data; tax residency; tax nature based on the perspective of Italy and the investors' jurisdictions; existence of any disregarded permanent establishment
  • Description of the process: Description of the internal procedure implemented to investigate on the existence of any tax-hybrid mismatch
  • Relevant Transactions: Detailed description of each Relevant Transaction, including an indication of the type of hybrid and tax treatment in any relevant jurisdiction, by providing evidence (e.g., of the possible reaction applied by one jurisdiction or by explaining why the taxpayer believes there is no hybrid) and describing the analysis process utilized

On the other hand, Annex B (point 1) provides the procedure the taxpayer must follow to identify the Relevant Transactions and Homogeneous Groups with respect to the potential existence of Covered Tax-Hybrid Mismatches. For example, in the case of a "deduction-with-no-inclusion" mismatch, the taxpayer must disclose the features of the deducted item of income, explain how the other involved jurisdictions view this deducted item of income, identify the beneficiary of the payment from the perspective of each relevant state, analyze the tax transparent/opaque nature of the beneficiary from the different perspectives of the involved jurisdictions, and explain any absence of reaction by any of the involved jurisdictions.

Annex B (point 2) addressees the special penalty protection procedure for imported hybrid mismatches, where the detailed description of each covered transaction in the Documentation (which remains an annual mandatory requirement for direct hybrids) is replaced by the adoption of a general internal control framework. The explanation report to the Implementing Decree clarifies that the taxpayer may alternatively stick to the ordinary Documentation procedure with respect to the imported hybrids (but in this case, the penalty protection will only cover the imported hybrid transactions specifically addressed in the Documentation and only with reference to the relevant FY).

Article 4 (Structure and content of the Documentation) — The Documentation must be prepared for each FY and will provide for penalty protection only to the extent it describes the relevant transactions (an exception may be made for imported hybrids covered by the special control framework, where adopted) and includes the requirements specified in Annex A for each relevant taxpayer.

Article 5 (Form of the Documentation) — The Documentation must be prepared in Italian and electronically signed by the company's legal representative (or by a delegate) with a timestamp showing a date not subsequent to that of the CIT return filing for the FY covered by the Documentation. For the FY ongoing on 29 December 2023, the deadline for the electronic signature and the timestamp is the deadline for the CIT return filing related to the FY during which the Implementing Decree has come into force. For instance, a calendar-year taxpayer that wants to benefit from the Documentation for FYs 2023 and 2024 will have to electronically sign and apply the timestamp by the deadline for filing the 2024 CIT return (i.e., the end of October 2025 or by the end of the tenth month following the end of the FY). If the taxpayer avails itself of the 90-day extension term to file the CIT return (which includes the notice about the existence of the Documentation), the date of the electronic signature and timestamp may be extended accordingly. In any case, the Documentation notice in the CIT return can be made only after having drafted the Documentation and duly complying with the electric signature and timestamp requirements. The Empowered Taxpayer that prepares the Documentation is responsible for complying with the electronic signature and timestamp deadlines. The Documentation must be drafted in electronic format and provided to the tax authorities no later than 20 working days from the tax authorities' request date. The Documentation may be provided in paper format, as long as an electronic format (with the date of the relevant electronic signature and timestamp compliant with the above-mentioned rules) is then filed by a congruous term indicated by the authorities.

Article 6 (Terms for Documentation delivery) — The Documentation must be provided to the authorities within 20 working days of their request for it. The authorities may ask for more information by providing an additional 30-working-day term and another 60-day maximum term. Complying with such terms is a prerequisite for benefitting from the penalty protection.

Article 7 (Effects of the Documentation) — The penalty protection applies only with regard to the Relevant Transactions and Homogeneous Groups covered by the Documentation and only if the Documentation was properly prepared. If one Relevant Transaction is not duly reported, the Documentation will have no effect with regard to that transaction but may still be valid with respect to other covered Relevant Transactions. For imported hybrid mismatches, the penalty protection applies if the taxpayer shows, among other things, correct adoption of the internal control framework process as requested under Article 3 and in compliance with point 2 of Annex B.

Article 8 (Extension and conditions for the effectiveness of the Documentation) — The effects of the Documentation are limited to the relevant FY. The Documentation must be preserved until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitation and will provide penalty protection only to the extent the information included in it is truthful, complete and in compliance with the Implementing Decree's instructions. The Documentation must also include a qualifying electronic signature and timestamp. Minor omissions or inaccuracies that do not impede a proper analysis should not result in a denial of penalty protection.

Article 9 (Documentation notice) — Taxpayers shall provide notice to the tax authorities regarding the existence of the Documentation in the CIT return related to the FY covered by the Documentation. Taxpayers preparing Documentation for FYs preceding the FY ongoing on the effective date of the Implementing Decree must provide notice via the CIT return model approved by the tax authorities after such date (e.g., a calendar-year taxpayer who wants to notify the tax authorities about the existence of the Documentation for FYs 2020–2022, as well as for FYs 2023 and 2024, should do so by using the CIT return for FY 2024 to be filed for calendar-year taxpayers generally by the end of October 2025).

Article 10 (Absent or noncompliant Documentation) — If no Documentation has been prepared or the prepared Documentation is not in compliance with the Implementing Decree's provisions, the missing or deficient Documentation cannot be considered as an element in favor of the existence of a hybrid mismatch.

Article 11 (Documentation for FYs prior to the one ongoing on 29 December 2023) — Any Documentation prepared for FYs prior to the one ongoing on 29 December 2023 is valid if it has been electronically signed and marked with a timestamp by the final term of the "Transitional Period" (i.e., in practice, by the sixth month following the "approval" of the Implementing Decree), and it complies with the requirements laid out in Articles 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9 of the Implementing Decree. As to the starting point for the computation of the six-month term, the "approval" date of the Implementing Decree referred to by the rules should be reasonably assumed as the date of publication of the decree (i.e., 20 December 2024) or, more conservatively, as the date when the decree was released by the Ministry of Economy and Finance (i.e., 6 December 2024). In any case, access to the penalty protection regime is barred for Relevant Transactions that, prior to 29 December 2023, the tax authorities had assessed as violating the Italian anti-hybrid provisions and for which audit activities had already begun.

Article 12 (Interaction with the cooperative compliance program) — This article provides guidance regarding the interaction between the tax-hybrid penalty protection regime and the Italian cooperative compliance program.5

Article 13 (Transitional measures) — This article further expands on interactions between the new regime and the cooperative compliance program. In addition, it clarifies that, even if not respecting the requirements under Article 3.2, above, for FYs prior to the one ongoing when the Implementing Decree enters into force, the penalty protection regime may still apply if the applied analysis process is adequate to identify any Relevant Transaction or Homogeneous Group, and the potential existence of Covered Tax Hybrids.

Implications

Multinationals with Italian subsidiaries or Italian permanent establishments should immediately consider the opportunity to avail themselves of the Documentation. They should carry out analyses to ascertain the existence of any Relevant Transaction that may potentially qualify as a direct or imported tax-hybrid, including a retroactive analysis for past FYs starting from 2020 (first year of application of the Italian anti-hybrid rules). Once the analysis is concluded, depending on the outcome, affected entities should consider preparing the relevant Documentation according to the Implementing Decree in an effort to benefit from penalty protection in the case of a future audit.

* * * * * * * * * *

Endnotes

1 See EY Global Tax Alert, Italy issues 2024 Budget Law and tax reform decrees, dated 23 January 2024.

2 "Imported hybrids" generally refer to situations in which a payment made by an Italian company does not give rise to a (direct) hybrid, because the corresponding item of income is taxed in the recipient's jurisdiction. However, it may happen that the effect of a hybrid mismatch between the foreign recipient (or other parties further involved in the supply chain) and entities residing in other countries is shifted (i.e., "imported") into Italy through the original payment made by the Italian company. For example, a potential imported hybrid risk exists if an Italian company purchases goods or services from a foreign related party (First Recipient) that incurs costs vis-à-vis another related entity (Third Related Entity), where the Third Related Entity does not subject the corresponding income to tax because of a hybrid element. The same risk may exist even if the Third Related Entity taxes the income but any other company directly or indirectly involved in a chain of payments with the First Recipient) does not subject to tax any relevant income because of a hybrid element.

3 "Structured arrangements" under Italian rules may occur if an agreement between unrelated parties is aimed at achieving a hybrid-mismatch outcome.

4 See EY Global Tax Alerts, Italy approves framework for major tax reform, including BEPS Pillar Two principles, dated 25 August 2023, and Italy launches BEPS 2.0 Pillar Two draft law for public consultation, dated 13 September 2023.

5 See EY Global Tax Alert, Italy's new Enabling Law for Tax Reform foreshadows positive changes to cooperative compliance program, dated 28 September 2023.

* * * * * * * * * *
Contact Information

For additional information concerning this Alert, please contact:

Studio Legale Tributario, International Tax and Transaction Services, Milan

Studio Legale Tributario, Financial Services Office, Milan

Studio Legale Tributario, Rome

Studio Legale Tributario, Bologna

Studio Legale Tributario, Florence

Studio Legale Tributario, Torino

Studio Legale Tributario, Treviso

Ernst & Young LLP (United Kingdom), Italian Tax Desk, London

Ernst & Young LLP (United States), Italian Tax Desk, New York

Published by NTD’s Tax Technical Knowledge Services group; Carolyn Wright, legal editor

Document ID: 2025-0158